Socrates lived from about 469 to 399 BC, in Athens, which emerged as the leading cultural, political, and even military center of Greece during his lifetime. Born the son of a stonecutter, he was from the working class at a time when almost all intellectuals were from the aristocracy, so that as wealthy landowners and slaveholders they could enjoy a life of leisure (scholē, the source of the word ‘school’). By the force of his intellect and determination, he studied with a natural philosopher, Archelaus, and encountered famous Sophists who came to Athens to teach, but he turned away from both approaches to knowledge. Instead of inquiring into the laws of nature or pursuing training for political success, he turned to questions of morality. What made a person good or evil, or an action right or wrong?
Rather than developing a systematic theory or a popular practice, he resorted to a method of question and answer. Responding to an endorsement of him by the Oracle at Delphi, which said that no one was wiser than he, Socrates sought interviews with the wise and famous in Athens in the hope of finding someone wiser than himself. In the process he offended influential people, but also built up a following of earnest young men who believed that his inquiries were making them virtuous and wise. Socrates seems to have practiced the virtue he was seeking, risking his life in battle as a citizen soldier, in the forum when he insisted on following constitutional procedures in a trial, and as a citizen when he refused to arrest an innocent man at the behest of a lawless government put in place at the end of the Peloponnesian War.
Socrates was put on trial in the summer of 399 BC on charges of impiety and corrupting the youth. He was condemned and put to death. After his death, however, his young followers, including Plato the future philosopher and Xenophon the future soldier of fortune and historian, revived Socrates in dialogues they published, showing him in action as a philosophers and devotee of virtue. In the end they won the propaganda war against the enemies of Socrates and convinced Athens and the world that Socrates was, as he had said in his trial, God’s gift to Athens.
An ongoing challenge for scholarship is the effort to identify what, in the writings of Plato and other sources of Socrates, belongs to the historical Socrates, and what is the invention of the authors who write about him. This is known as the Socratic Problem. I happen to think that significant progress has been made in this area. Plato was a brilliant enough philosopher to understand the method in Socrates’ madness; he shows us how he worked, and lets us figure out why he does what he does. A century or more of scholarship has identified the early, middle, and late dialogues of Plato. In the early dialogues, we get a picture of the historical Socrates and how he worked, even though most of the conversations presented are fictional: Plato presents a faithful account of the kinds of things Socrates said and did.
In the middle dialogues, by contrast, Plato develops his own theory (as we learn from Plato’s student Aristotle). Instead of professing his ignorance, the character Socrates becomes a know-it-all who pontificates on speculative theories (of Plato) and defends them. In the late dialogues, Socrates, who sometimes takes a back seat to other speakers or disappears altogether, tends to discourse on more scientific and systematic theories (of Plato). So the early dialogues provide a reliable picture of Socrates, one consistent with what other contemporary sources have to say about him. In the early dialogues Plato offers a life-like and compelling portrait of the paradoxical figure he followed around for perhaps a decade.