The Presocratic Philosophers

Anaximander

In this ancient mosaic the philosopher is shown with his sundial.

The Cosmos

The philosophers before Socrates were concerned with the cosmos: how it came to be and how it maintains itself in an orderly way. This model derived from Anaximenes shows a disk-shaped earth with a firmament above where the stars are affixed and a free-moving sun circling above the surface of the earth.

Atomic Theory

The theory of atoms was invented in the mid-fifth century BC by Leucippus and further developed by Democritus. It proposed numberless tiny particles moving in a void, which could come together in temporary configurations to produce macroscopic objects. These grains of sand provide a picture of what the atomist had in mind. (Photo from BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/14106614 .)

Introduction

In the sixth and fifth centuries BC, a number of thinkers emerged in Greece who broke away from mythological thinking to approach the world in a naturalistic and increasingly scientific way.  They had no special name for themselves, but in light of their role as pioneers of what came to be known as philosophy we can call them philosophers.  Socrates came to be seen as a watershed in early Greek philosophers, so nineteenth-century AD scholars called them Presocratic philosophers, although some of them were Socrates’ contemporaries rather than predecessors.  They were especially known as philosophers of nature (Arisotle used the term physiologoi), most of whom developed their own theories of how nature works, and they provided models of the cosmos.  

Since the earliest thinkers came from Ionia (the modern Aegean coast of Turkey), they are often referred to as part of the Ionian tradition.  Their naturalistic theories provoked a reaction from Parmenides of Elea (a Greek city-state in southern Italy), who argued that change was impossible since it presupposed that what-is comes from what-is-not, beginning the Eleatic tradition of logical criticisms of natural philosophy.  The early philosophers were said to have founded “schools” such as the Eleatic school and somewhat later the atomist school.  Certainly the leading Presocratic philosophers had students, but the notion of institutions of higher learning seems anachronistic.  The early philosophers were probably more like tutors than lecturers to large classes. Nevertheless, their writings were widely read, and since the invention of the Greek alphabet (the first genuine alphabet) a century or so before they appeared, they were pioneers of prose writing for a wide audience; unlike other guilds of experts in the ancient world, they shared their ideas with anyone who was interested.

In the mid-fifth century BC there arose a movement of thinkers who called themselves Sophists.  Rather than theorizing by themselves or with a few colleagues and students, they traveled from city to city in the Greek world, giving lectures and short-term seminars for money, making them the first professors of adult education in Greece.  Some of them taught natural philosophy as part of their curriculum, but they emphasized practical over theoretical subjects: public speaking, financial management (forerunner of economics), and political science.  For this was the time when democracies arose, offering opportunities to young men who were not of the aristocratic class to become leaders of their cities.  Aristocrats had their old-boy networks to give their sons experience in leadership; the Sophists offered practical training to all who could pay their fees, a shortcut to fame and fortune.  The best Sophists became rich and famous from their practices.  

Socrates grew up in the age of democracy and of Sophistic education, but he turned away from the competitive and sometimes amoral ethos of the Sophists, as well as from the scientific approach of the natural philosophers.

Discussions

The Beginnings of Greek Philosophy 1: the right stuff

There is a story about how philosophy emerged in Greece in the sixth and fifth centuries BC.  It has a very good source, in Aristotle’s history of the subject, and it has been developed and endorsed by many of the leading historians of philosophy in the twentieth century AD.  This time I will tell you that story.  Next time, I will tell you what is wrong with it. Here is Aristotle’s statement: Of the first philosophers, the majority thought the principles of all things were found only in the class

Read More »

The Beginnings of Greek Philosophy 2: a funny thing happened on the way to Elea

Material Monism? Last time we learned the standard story of how philosophy began among the Greeks.  First there were Material Monists, who held that the world started from some basic stuff, such as water (according to Thales), air (according to Anaximenes), fire (according to Heraclitus), or perhaps earth (according to Xenophanes).  The basic stuff changed into other stuffs, or, to be precise, it stayed what it was, but changed in its appearance.  For instance, according to Anaximenes, air, when it became rarified, manifested itself as fire; when it was condensed

Read More »

The Beginnings of Greek Philosophy 3: where have all the monists gone?

We have now looked at the standard account of the beginnings of Greek philosophy, which proposes three stages of development: The early Ionian philosophers are (mostly) Material Monists: they propose one stuff that is the only stuff in existence in the original state of things, and which becomes differentiated into different stuffs, but always keeps its identity.  For instance, Thales says that everything comes from water and even having changed its appearance into other things like earth, air, and fire, wood, and flesh, it still IS water. Parmenides challenges this

Read More »

The Beginnings of Greek Philosophy 4: Between a Rock and a Hard Place

We have seen that there are fundamental problems with the standard account of early Greek philosophy.  The alleged Material Monists seem not be Monists but Pluralists.  They allow their original, generating substance, such as water for Thales, air for Anaximenes, to change into other substances.  Heraclitus accepts their general picture, but rejects their conclusions: if the generating substance turns into other substances and they turn back into the generating substance, then no substance is permanent, or ultimately real. What is real in one sense is constant change.  But this does

Read More »

The Beginnings of Greek Philosophy 5: Parmenides 2.0 and Eleatic Pluralism

We left off last time with Parmenides having trashed everything that went before him by arguing that, since what-is-not is-not, and only what-is is, there could be no change and no differentiation.  For change and differentiation entail something besides what-is, namely what-is-not, and what-is-not is-not.  If we take this argument at face value, it means that there is only one thing in the universe, namely what-is.  It has, as we have seen, four Eleatic properties: (1) it is without coming-to-be and perishing, (2) it is all alike and undifferentiated, (3)

Read More »

The Genius of Heraclitus: What he really said.

Heraclitus the Obscure Heraclitus is arguably the most-misunderstood philosopher of all time.  He is famous for being obscure and contrary—a maverick who advances extreme and indefensible theses about the world.  And, starting with Plato and Aristotle, he is perhaps the most-refuted philosopher of all time.  His critics, ancient and modern, hold him up to ridicule as an exemplar of bad philosophy. But all of this is unfortunate because until the twentieth century, no one had a clue as to what he was really saying.  Here are three of his most

Read More »

3 thoughts on “Presocratics”

  1. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.
    You definitely know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you could
    be giving us something informative to read?

  2. Attractive element of content. I just stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to say that I acquire
    in fact enjoyed account your weblog posts.
    Anyway I will be subscribing in your feeds or even I fulfillment you get entry to persistently fast.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *