The Presocratic Philosophers

Anaximander

In this ancient mosaic the philosopher is shown with his sundial.

The Cosmos

The philosophers before Socrates were concerned with the cosmos: how it came to be and how it maintains itself in an orderly way. This model derived from Anaximenes shows a disk-shaped earth with a firmament above where the stars are affixed and a free-moving sun circling above the surface of the earth.

Atomic Theory

The theory of atoms was invented in the mid-fifth century BC by Leucippus and further developed by Democritus. It proposed numberless tiny particles moving in a void, which could come together in temporary configurations to produce macroscopic objects. These grains of sand provide a picture of what the atomist had in mind. (Photo from BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/14106614 .)

Introduction

In the sixth and fifth centuries BC, a number of thinkers emerged in Greece who broke away from mythological thinking to approach the world in a naturalistic and increasingly scientific way.  They had no special name for themselves, but in light of their role as pioneers of what came to be known as philosophy we can call them philosophers.  Socrates came to be seen as a watershed in early Greek philosophers, so nineteenth-century AD scholars called them Presocratic philosophers, although some of them were Socrates’ contemporaries rather than predecessors.  They were especially known as philosophers of nature (Arisotle used the term physiologoi), most of whom developed their own theories of how nature works, and they provided models of the cosmos.  

Since the earliest thinkers came from Ionia (the modern Aegean coast of Turkey), they are often referred to as part of the Ionian tradition.  Their naturalistic theories provoked a reaction from Parmenides of Elea (a Greek city-state in southern Italy), who argued that change was impossible since it presupposed that what-is comes from what-is-not, beginning the Eleatic tradition of logical criticisms of natural philosophy.  The early philosophers were said to have founded “schools” such as the Eleatic school and somewhat later the atomist school.  Certainly the leading Presocratic philosophers had students, but the notion of institutions of higher learning seems anachronistic.  The early philosophers were probably more like tutors than lecturers to large classes. Nevertheless, their writings were widely read, and since the invention of the Greek alphabet (the first genuine alphabet) a century or so before they appeared, they were pioneers of prose writing for a wide audience; unlike other guilds of experts in the ancient world, they shared their ideas with anyone who was interested.

In the mid-fifth century BC there arose a movement of thinkers who called themselves Sophists.  Rather than theorizing by themselves or with a few colleagues and students, they traveled from city to city in the Greek world, giving lectures and short-term seminars for money, making them the first professors of adult education in Greece.  Some of them taught natural philosophy as part of their curriculum, but they emphasized practical over theoretical subjects: public speaking, financial management (forerunner of economics), and political science.  For this was the time when democracies arose, offering opportunities to young men who were not of the aristocratic class to become leaders of their cities.  Aristocrats had their old-boy networks to give their sons experience in leadership; the Sophists offered practical training to all who could pay their fees, a shortcut to fame and fortune.  The best Sophists became rich and famous from their practices.  

Socrates grew up in the age of democracy and of Sophistic education, but he turned away from the competitive and sometimes amoral ethos of the Sophists, as well as from the scientific approach of the natural philosophers.

Discussions

24.6 Weaving the Fabric of the State

Plato’s Visitor sums up his previous discussion by observing, “The art that governs all these matters and takes care of the law and all civic affairs, weaving them together in the best possible way, we would reasonably, I think, drawing on the term for the community, call by the term statesmanship.”[25]  That is, the master art of the polis is the politikē technē.  And its work, if we haven’t noticed, consists of a weaving together of the different threads that make up the state.  Plato now turns back to his

Read More »

Being 1.3: The Being of Becoming

What is really real?  According to Thales, it was Water.  According to Anaximander, it was the Boundless.  According to Anaximenes, it was Air.  There was a fourth early figure, Xenophanes, who may have held that what was really real was Earth.  (Aristotle, one of our main sources for reports of early thinkers, doesn’t think much of Xenophanes, so he tends to get left of the the story.  But he has a good claim to be a serious contributor to early thought.)  So which stuff deserves to win the prize as

Read More »

Being 1.3. Being vs. Not-Being

Parmenides’ Response Just when it seemed to be safe to consider Becoming as supplying the origin of Being, there arose a serious challenge to Becoming.  The author was Parmenides of Elea, a Greek city-state in southern Italy, and the first important philosopher to come from a western Greek city.  Almost all of the previous thinkers (all but Xenophanes, who was a wandering minstrel), wrote prose treatises.  Parmenides offered a poem in epic meter, in which a young man (presumably Parmenides’ avatar) is led by chariot to the House of Night

Read More »

Being 1.4.3: Parmenides the Scientist

So far we can recognize Parmenides as offering a significant alternative to the quasi-scientific theories of his predecessors: a theory in which the world is composed of changeless elements that combine in compounds.  It turns out that the insight he developed offered the foundation of the true account of substances arrived at scientifically in the nineteenth century CE.  The future development of science was, of course, unknown and unknowable to the thinkers of earlier centuries, and so could not, of itself, have motivated a major shift of thinking about the

Read More »

Being 1.4.4: Parmenides the Revolutionary

Parmenides may well, as most scholars think, have developed his alternative cosmology mainly as an object lesson on the futility of cosmologies.  After all, he announced at the outset of his cosmological treatise that positing two “forms” or elements, namely Light and Night, was a mistake.  Yet he put a great deal more effort into his alternative cosmology than was really necessary if it was, in the end, only a throw-away theory.  Although we do not know how many lines his cosmological treatise took up in the poem, by all

Read More »

Being 1.5: the Rebirth of Cosmology

1.5.1 How is change possible? Parmenides had seemingly dealt a fatal blow to cosmology and the proto-scientific project that had characterized the earliest phase of philosophy.  But if there was nothing but Being, and Being could not be differentiated and could not change in any way, Parmenides had said everything that could be said about What-Is in a few lines of his grandiose poem.  Natural philosophy and science were dead, and there was no obvious way to revive them. According to the wisdom of the twentieth century, Parmenides was the

Read More »

3 thoughts on “Presocratics”

  1. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.
    You definitely know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you could
    be giving us something informative to read?

  2. Attractive element of content. I just stumbled upon your site and in accession capital to say that I acquire
    in fact enjoyed account your weblog posts.
    Anyway I will be subscribing in your feeds or even I fulfillment you get entry to persistently fast.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *